Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Text Analysis: Destruction of the Indies

Destruction of the Indies

“The Destruction of the Indies” is a personal account in a form of a letter by Bartoleme de Las Casas. Las Casa was a colonist, who traveled to the Indies as a soldier then as an encomendero. After witnessing the inhumane treatment of the Indians, he became an activist and advocate for the rights of the native people. He also became an ordained priest, a platform he used to preach against the injustice in the New World and change the ways of the Christian Spaniards. 

In the “The Destruction of the Indies,” he argues about the significant negative impact of Europeans presence in the Indies. Since the arrival of the Spaniards, the once populated islands of the Indies were desolate and deserted. The Indians were tortured, raped, burned, hanged, and slaughtered. He argues that at least twelve million native men, women, and children have been killed since the settlement of the Spaniards in the Indies. The native Indians civilization was lost and their wealth plundered. He argues that this has been going on for forty years but nothing has been done to stop or change the colonist ways. He argues that the Indians were the kindest and humblest people on earth, who did not deserve to be mistreated or killed in such ways.

Las Casas gives a very detailed account of the acts committed by the Spaniards against the helpless and innocent Indians. He uses descriptive language to plead his case and appeal to his audience that there must be a change in the ways of colonists. He paints a vivid image of the crimes committed against the Indians. Phrase such as “dismembering them but cutting to pieces as if dealing with sheep in the slaughter house” is an example of his use of emotional language. “They took infants from their mother’s breasts, snatching them by the arm and threw them into the rivers,” is another example of his use of graphic language to appeal to pathos. The text is full of gruesome images, which is hard to read at times.

This document is historically significant because it is an eyewitness account of the first interaction between the Europeans and the native Indians. It paints the full effect and extent of colonialism in the sixteenth century, which was to kill and conquer by any means in order to gain wealth. A civilization was lost over a short period and there are no real documents about the history and culture of the Indians. The killing and torturing was happening for forty years but the Europeans were still in denial about it. Through their actions, the Spaniards send the message to the rest of the world that native people were worthless and inferior people. Other Europeans were able to exploit Indians because of this message.

I think the author’s argument is convincing for many reasons. For one, he had nothing to gain by defending the Indians, who were helpless and powerless. He had everything to lose by standing against the colonists, who were ruthless and merciless. But he chose to speak against the injustice because of his religious belief, which he mentions many times as being a “Christian.” He also goes into great length to describe the Indians as being the good natured people on earth, which shows he genuinely loved and honored them and did not want to see them suffer for no reason.

3 comments:

  1. After reading, “The Destruction of the Indies” and your blog, I agree with your points that was made. For example, when you mentioned that the Europeans would conquer and kill by any means to receive wealth. It seemed like the Europeans cared about their own agenda to gain wealth, that they had little regards for the native people. And I felt that it had to do with their thinking that they were superior and the natives were inferior. And I agree with your point that this made other Europeans have the idea that it’s okay to kill the natives because they were inferior. Certainly, we can see from the textbook that the natives were very welcoming towards the Europeans, but the Europeans only cared about their own agenda of gaining wealth, that they didn’t care about them, and would do everything in their power to eliminate them. Also, I agree with your points about the author, Bartolome de Las Casas; I think he was a great advocate to talk about the native people, since Europeans didn’t value the native people at that time, and talked about the horrible treatment that they received from the Europeans.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The blog and reading on “The Destruction of the Indies” was insulting, hurtful and just plain mean. I appreciate the fact that Bartoleme de Las Casas took the time to form a letter to inform us about what was happening to these kind welcoming people. Well reading I felt the European where very much greedy, selfish, heartless to how the natives lived. Only wanting to satisfy there on adventures and not caring how people lived. I agree with the blogger that it was hard to read about the Indies being subjected to this kind of torture the Spaniards delivered. One of the photos in the book displayed the Spaniards drawing the Indies in to do backbreaking work for them. How do you prepare yourself for something that you never suspected could ever happen to you? They had to succumb to the European’s disease, beatings, and thievery. After all this abuse the Indies felt like they were “born to die”. This makes it had to want to keep on living that kind and sweet welcoming life you once had and showed to others. The Indies opening there hearts and welcoming these people on to there land brought them to Destruction because they didn’t know the other person plan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It’s funny how their original focus was supposed to be to represent the crown and set forth there with the intentions of converting the Natives to Christianity. However, the Spaniards had their own agenda, Gold and Labor. I guess when they realized there was no wealth and the Natives were simple-minded people, I think they were disappointed. And to ease the pain of no wealth they decided to commit horrendous act of torture and murder amongst the Native. Giving no hesitation the gender, or age. I really don’t understand how they could equate no wealth to murder and mayhem. Eventually they still had to report back to the Crown. What did they say when The Queen said “Where are my Christians".

    ReplyDelete